The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry  
Home Summary of Report Download the report as a PDF Help


<Home | <Contents | <Summary



previous | next


Summary
Dividing line

Management Failings
Dividing line

40.  Alder Hey and the University failed properly to resource the Chair of Fetal and Infant Pathology from the outset.

41.  Alder Hey and the University ignored warnings from independent assessors about the essential requirements of the post not being available.

42.  Alder Hey and the University, knowing of the risks inherent in the appointment of Professor van Velzen to the Chair of Fetal and Infant Pathology, failed to supervise and performance manage the new unit.

43.  Alder Hey and the University failed in conjunction with the Mersey Regional Health Authority to provide resources for the perinatal pathology service in response to Professor van Velzen's cries for help in 1988 and 1990.

44.  The University failed at any stage to recognise their responsibility to resource the Chair of Fetal and Infant Pathology.

45.  Alder Hey and the University failed to implement the job plan and additional supervision laid down by their Joint Review in 1993.

46.  The Chief MLSOs were complicit in Professor van Velzen's falsifications and the Service Manager at Alder Hey allowed himself to be sidelined.

47.  Alder Hey and the University failed to ensure that histology was reinstated when they became aware that Professor van Velzen had abandoned the service from spring 1991 in the case of Alder Hey and June1993 in the case of the University.

48.  Alder Hey and the University failed to monitor and follow up complaints about delay in providing post mortem and histology reports.

49.  Alder Hey and the University permitted Professor van Velzen to abdicate his clinical duties and responsibilities.

50.  Alder Hey and the University missed numerous opportunities to discipline Professor van Velzen for justifiable reasons from 1989 onwards.

51.  Alder Hey and the University failed to investigate Professor van Velzen's post mortem practice in the period 1988 to 1995 which would have revealed the retention of every organ in every case.

52.  Alder Hey and the University failed to apply or follow up proper audit procedures and management systems to Professor van Velzen's Unit of Fetal and Infant Pathology throughout his tenure when there was reason for continuing audit.

53.  Alder Hey failed to institute proper cataloguing of organs and left them to the University without establishing a proper audit trail in the event of future inquiry.

54.  The University failed to institute a proper system for cataloguing organs.

55.  The University consistently ignored its conflict of interest with Alder Hey and FSID.

56. Alder Hey and the University failed to prevent Professor van Velzen's excesses, thereby imperilling patient care.


Return to top of page

© Crown Copyright 2001. Legal notice.
Last updated 30th January 2001

home | summary of report | download report as PDF | help