The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry  
Home Summary of Report Download the report as a PDF Help


<Home | <Contents | <Recommendations



previous | next


Recommendations
Dividing line

Chapter 8. The van Velzen Years
Dividing line

Relationship Between Universities and Trusts
Dividing line

Whatever the underlying contractual position, the relationship between Universities
and Trusts, in respect of individuals and departments with dual clinical and academic
functions, shall be one of the utmost good faith in both directions.

The duty of utmost good faith shall require either party to disclose to the other any substantial matter relating to the performance of the individual or department, whether clinical or academic.

Where there is any doubt as to whether a matter is of a substantial nature, if it relates to patient care the doubt shall always be resolved in favour of disclosure.

The appointment of clinical academics shall be approached with fair representation on each side reflecting the proposed split between clinical and academic sessions.

The appointment of external advisors shall be approached on the basis that they are truly external, if not strictly independent in a legal sense. There is no point having external advisers as ‘window dressing’ for a fixed internal view. Where they or representatives of the Royal Colleges give advice, proper weight shall be given to that advice. In giving advice, external advisers shall bear in mind the paramount requirement of patient care where there is a conflict of interest.

A single job description for clinical academics shall be drawn up jointly to represent a fair and realistic expectation of the work envisaged by both parties.

There shall be a joint procedure for disciplinary action against an individual perceived to be failing. It shall contain provision for immediate suspension from patient care as a minimum, irrespective of academic requirements and positions.

There shall be formal annual appraisal of an individual by both parties. They shall share their information in line with the duty of utmost good faith in order to draw up a joint statement of aims in the following 12 months against which the next appraisal is to be judged.

Where there is disagreement each party shall reconsider bearing in mind that patient care is of paramount importance. In the event of continued disagreement an arbitrator may be appointed, but in any case the Trust shall take immediate steps to secure proper patient care.

The relationship between Universities and funding bodies shall be of the utmost good faith and similar considerations shall apply.


Return to top of page

© Crown Copyright 2001. Legal notice.
Last updated 30th January 2001

home | summary of report | download report as PDF | help