The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry  
Home Summary of Report Download the report as a PDF Help


<Home | <Contents | <Recommendations



previous | next


Recommendations
Dividing line

Chapter 8. The van Velzen Years
Dividing line

Recommendations
Dividing line

The following recommendations arise out of the mistakes in the ‘van Velzen Years’ and are essential to avoid their repetition in the event of the coming of another Professor van Velzen. The recommendations are evidence-based in the sense that they are straightforward safeguards based on our analysis of the actual mistakes made by both Alder Hey and the University. Many of the mistakes are of a type that must be frequent but do not in the usual course of events lead to disaster. They are nevertheless better avoided.

Our recommendations are also evidence-based in a different sense. The themes in the recommendations formed the basis of the actual questioning during the course of the Inquiry. They have been tested not just by us in our deliberations but also gauged against the reaction of witnesses to the potential criticisms raised. Very few witnesses had any difficulty in seeing the force of the points and most were comfortable to concede what should have been the tests governing the behaviour of them and others involved. The difficulty came not in terms of the concept but when people found on reflection that they had not lived up to the sentiments expressed. Mutual trust between universities and hospitals could have avoided the worst excesses of Professor van Velzen. All witnesses agreed that such trust is essential for the future.


Return to top of page

© Crown Copyright 2001. Legal notice.
Last updated 30th January 2001

home | summary of report | download report as PDF | help